Hope You're Sitting Down: Study Shows Running GOOD For You!
by Andrew Heffernan
Oct 30, 2008
It seems to have calmed down a bit in the last few months, but
there's
been a bit of a schism for a while now between endurance types and the
weight training types. In a word, runners and their ilk have
become the Star-Bellied Sneeches of the fitness world.
The muscle-heads got good and frothy over the fact that running and
other endurance activities apparently 'interfered' with sought-after
their strength and muscle gains. Studies seemed to bear this
out, and weight-training types breathed a sigh of relief because that
meant they could cut out the roadwork guilt-free.
Unflattering pictures of emaciated marathoners cropped up like weeds on
fitness websites, with the stern warning beneath: "Is THIS
how you want to look??", and hypertrophied giants would awaken from
nightmares, convinced that a mob of skinny endurance athletes was going
to force them to walk a city block.
The interference effect might be real; it might not be. The
jury's still out.
From there, things got ugly: not only would running
jeopardize hard-earned muscle mass, but it would in fact KILL
YOU! Anecdotes cropped up: this guy had a heart
attack from running too hard. That guy decided to do an extra
lap, now he has to be fed through a tube. My cousin Willie
ran headfirst into a threshing machine.
As a guy who lifts and runs, I started to feel like a smoker.
I looked ahead to the days of speakeasy-style running clubs and running
shoes that were only available on the black market.
So I was relieved to see a study that actually reconfirms what runners
have been pretty sure of for quite some time: that running
is--wait for it--good for you. According to this piece by Dr.
Sanjay Gupta,
Stanford University
researchers began studying 538 middle-aged runners back in the
1980s...21 years of research...show that the runners did not have
higher rates of osteoarthritis and total knee replacements. And the
onset of disabilities appeared 12 to 16 years later in the runners'
group vs. the nonrunners'.
That's huge; imagine living independently or delaying the use of a cane
for an extra decade or more. There were also half as many deaths in the
runners' group than in the nonrunners' during the study.
Okay, that is interesting: running enhanced
longevity in the study. Up to now I'd been under the
impression that running enhanced quality of life but didn't actually
tack years onto it. Color me pleasantly surprised.
Running and other
weight-bearing exercises...also help you reduce your risk of America's
biggest killer, heart disease.
Again, a bit of a surprise, I'm almost ashamed to say, based
on all the
horror stories I've been hearing.
.. "Studies
show running itself isn't bad on the joints," says Dr. Amadeus Mason,
an orthopedist at Emory University's Sports Medicine Center. "The issue
is if you get an injury and keep running on it."
And--surprise #3. It's not going to destroy your joints,
either.
I suspect this won't be the last word on this, but I'm heartened to see
some real numbers that repudiate some of the hard knocks endurance
training has taken at the calloused hands of the iron-pumping crowd of
late. I mean, can't we all just get along?
Male
Pattern Fitness