Sheer simplicity. There are quite a few websites that use this formula to present online race time predictors. The final exponential element is the key. I've seen some references to this as basically a percentage of slow down (i.e. 1.06 = 6% slow down). However, the value is acutally derived from the slope of a trend line drawn though plots of velocity at different distances.
One unique and interesting aspect of Riegel's formula is it's adaptability. One can plot world record times, projected times from any of the other popular prediction tables, or even plot a trend of their own personal times. These custom trend plots result in a "best match" exponent that very closely models the input data. Anyone interested in seeing a few trend charts first hand, and/or running a trend on your own times can download the RiegelPredictor.xls Excel 2002 workbook available in the Downloads section.
I recently encorporated Pete's formula into RunPro, breathing new life and credibility into a 20 year old program. The flexibllity of the formula allowed me to closely approximate 4 different coaches' training guidelines. RunPro also allows users to set a custom value for Riegel's exponent (referred to by that program as Rx). So if you run a trend on your times using the RiegelPredictor.xls file I mention above, you can set the value you obtain in RunPro, giving you your very own personalized racing and training calculator. (Actually, the RiegelPredictor.xls workbook has a built in racing/training calculator worksheet as well).
Riegel's formula does best with distances between 5k and marathon. It deviates from other models at shorter distances. I've added a fudge factor in RunPro to compensate for this, so if you happen to compare RunPro to other predictors based on the Riegel formula, the numbers won't match up for distances below 5k.
Herman
Posted: 25.01.2012, 01:53
registered:
January 2012
Status:
offline
last visit:
25.01.12
Posts:
1
The race time predictions are estimates of what a runner might achieve, if they train appropriately for the distance. It does not mean, for example, that if you train for a 5km and achieve a good time, then you will automatically achieve the corresponding time at the marathon distance.
Posted: 11.06.2012, 20:01
registered:
June 2012
Status:
offline
last visit:
11.06.12
Posts:
3
Reading and learning both targets meet here.read more
"I meant to let you know, since using your amazing program religiously. I have now run 88min for a half (2 min PB), 3:13 for a marathon (17 min PB) 40:40 for 10k (2 min
PB)" DT - South Africa
"My girlfriend and I are both really benefiting from using RunCoach
-- I'm running consistently for the first time in many years, and the program's
been great." EO - Boston, MA
"you are doing a great service for coaches and athletes, I admire
your foresight and knowledge. My top marathoner is going to Manchester, I will
be with him thanks to ASA. Medal I hope. Best 10km this week 28.12"
DS - South Africa
"I love your software! I have tried other programs and none matches
up to RunCoach." JF - Oak Park, IL
"Thanks for the great program." MC - Needham, MA
"I am using RunCoach now for a couple of years although I am not
racing but at least it helped improve fitness and lose those kilos overweight I
had. I'll stick to your RunCoach forever." AT - Luxembourg
"I just wanted to say how much I am enjoying RunCoach this running season. .... Thanks again. The latest update is suburb and running smoothly... like me!" JM - Canada
"just a short thank you for your very good programme, with its help I just finished my third marathon. This time I have really improved and reached 3h40m. I can assure you that your plan is a fantastic tool and it gets you
rolling. " DB - Czech Republic
RunCoach
